Thursday, August 28, 2008

More on Obama’s (non) Faith-Based Plans


In my last post I wrote about Obama’s plans to overhaul Bush’s “Faith-Based Initiative” program should Obama be elected president. As mentioned in that post, Obama would put rules in place to ensure that federal tax-payer money used by religious organizations can only be used for secular programs. Furthermore, it would prohibit proselytizing and religious discrimination in any program that makes use of federal funds.

I said that, on paper, this sounds fine with me. However, one of the two potential problems that I listed was that I find it hard to believe that any religious organization would be willing to agree to such restriction. Essentially, this plan would only fund “faith-based” programs provided that those programs remove the “faith” part! Take, for example, the Heritage Foundation’s (a conservative think tank) recent statement regarding Obama’s proposal:


But even worse, Obama’s plan says that when a faith-based organization takes federal dollars, it would lose its ability to preserve its faith-based character through maintaining hiring standards consistent with its mission. It could be forced to hire an atheist. In other words, it would strike at the heart of the faith-based initiative.

Well, regardless of the merits or the demerits of hiring an atheist, I understand the point they are trying to make here. Obama’s plan requires that a faith-based organization shed its faith-based character whenever using federal money. Unlike the Heritage Foundation, I agree that government tax-payer money should not be used to fund religious activities and I am skeptical that religion is an essential part of any social service.

This statement by the Heritage Foundation seems to confirm my suspicion that “faith-based” groups or organizations that favor the funding of “faith-based” social programs will not easily buy into the church-state separation principles underlying the proposal. That means in practice this plan seems like it will not only be less than satisfactory but will require a greater amount of supervision to ensure that “faith-based” groups who do accept federal money along with these restrictions are playing nicely with it.

Find out what I am doing right now by following me on Twitter! If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my RSS feed. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.
  • Subscribe to RSS feed!
  • E-mail this page to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • AtheistSpot
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • TwitThis
  • Google
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Tags: , , , |

Post a new comment

to top of page...