<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Reasons to Believe in God (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/</link>
	<description>Atheism &#38; Religious Skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Did Jesus Ever Say He was God? &#124; AnAtheist.Net</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-7797</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Jesus Ever Say He was God? &#124; AnAtheist.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-7797</guid>
		<description>[...] and is obviously aimed at college students. I first encountered this page when I examined their Six Reasons to Believe in God &#8211; which I found to be extremely wanting.  But I am willing to give them another chance. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and is obviously aimed at college students. I first encountered this page when I examined their Six Reasons to Believe in God &#8211; which I found to be extremely wanting.  But I am willing to give them another chance. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-1903</guid>
		<description>Marilyn Adamson&#8217;s Is there A God?

Oh come on! 

Ok God created the Universe, and yes the water is a perfect way of sustaining the life he created. Great!

 But things do not have to exist because we are told or have been defined to exist. We know a lot about Cupid, Santa Claus and all of them guys I mean we know their history and crap. . But that does not mean Santa Claus really exists?



It is not clear to me what adamson wrote, does he mean that god made the earth and its good design totally matches the water as life sustaining element?


So by having this complexity of our universe did God ever interacted with the Universe? Well if he really did, was there any proof or exhibition of such physical interaction? Was he ever detected by any means?   But how can someone not detectable ever logically existed??

Just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn Adamson&rsquo;s Is there A God?</p>
<p>Oh come on! </p>
<p>Ok God created the Universe, and yes the water is a perfect way of sustaining the life he created. Great!</p>
<p> But things do not have to exist because we are told or have been defined to exist. We know a lot about Cupid, Santa Claus and all of them guys I mean we know their history and crap. . But that does not mean Santa Claus really exists?</p>
<p>It is not clear to me what adamson wrote, does he mean that god made the earth and its good design totally matches the water as life sustaining element?</p>
<p>So by having this complexity of our universe did God ever interacted with the Universe? Well if he really did, was there any proof or exhibition of such physical interaction? Was he ever detected by any means?   But how can someone not detectable ever logically existed??</p>
<p>Just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Goas</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Goas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I have a major issue with the third pro-God point that you addressed:

&quot;3. &#8220;Chance&#8221; or &#8220;natural causes&#8221; are insufficient explanations.&quot;

Simply put, no they&#039;re not! Given the amount of time and variables in this world, percentages slant towards a planet created without a higher power. If you &#039;roll the dice&#039; enough times, you&#039;ll come up with every improbable scenario.

Looking forward to the second installment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I have a major issue with the third pro-God point that you addressed:</p>
<p>&quot;3. &ldquo;Chance&rdquo; or &ldquo;natural causes&rdquo; are insufficient explanations.&quot;</p>
<p>Simply put, no they&#039;re not! Given the amount of time and variables in this world, percentages slant towards a planet created without a higher power. If you &#039;roll the dice&#039; enough times, you&#039;ll come up with every improbable scenario.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the second installment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>Those 3 &quot;reasons&quot; are the same reason stated 3 different ways!

I believe in SuperGod.

10 Reasons to Believe in SuperGod:

1. Your god is too complex to have arisen purely by chance!
2. Your god&#039;s brain is too amazingly complex to have arisen by luck alone!
3. Chance and natural causes are insufficient explanations for your god!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those 3 &quot;reasons&quot; are the same reason stated 3 different ways!</p>
<p>I believe in SuperGod.</p>
<p>10 Reasons to Believe in SuperGod:</p>
<p>1. Your god is too complex to have arisen purely by chance!<br />
2. Your god&#039;s brain is too amazingly complex to have arisen by luck alone!<br />
3. Chance and natural causes are insufficient explanations for your god!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Your blog is interesting! 
 
Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog is interesting! </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Goas</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Goas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I have a major issue with the third pro-God point that you addressed:

&quot;3. “Chance” or “natural causes” are insufficient explanations.&quot;

Simply put, no they&#039;re not! Given the amount of time and variables in this world, percentages slant towards a planet created without a higher power. If you &#039;roll the dice&#039; enough times, you&#039;ll come up with every improbable scenario.

Looking forward to the second installment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I have a major issue with the third pro-God point that you addressed:</p>
<p>&#8220;3. “Chance” or “natural causes” are insufficient explanations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Simply put, no they&#8217;re not! Given the amount of time and variables in this world, percentages slant towards a planet created without a higher power. If you &#8216;roll the dice&#8217; enough times, you&#8217;ll come up with every improbable scenario.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the second installment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Marilyn Adamson’s Is there A God?

Oh come on! 

Ok God created the Universe, and yes the water is a perfect way of sustaining the life he created. Great!

 But things do not have to exist because we are told or have been defined to exist. We know a lot about Cupid, Santa Claus and all of them guys I mean we know their history and crap. . But that does not mean Santa Claus really exists?



It is not clear to me what adamson wrote, does he mean that god made the earth and its good design totally matches the water as life sustaining element?


So by having this complexity of our universe did God ever interacted with the Universe? Well if he really did, was there any proof or exhibition of such physical interaction? Was he ever detected by any means?   But how can someone not detectable ever logically existed??

Just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn Adamson’s Is there A God?</p>
<p>Oh come on! </p>
<p>Ok God created the Universe, and yes the water is a perfect way of sustaining the life he created. Great!</p>
<p> But things do not have to exist because we are told or have been defined to exist. We know a lot about Cupid, Santa Claus and all of them guys I mean we know their history and crap. . But that does not mean Santa Claus really exists?</p>
<p>It is not clear to me what adamson wrote, does he mean that god made the earth and its good design totally matches the water as life sustaining element?</p>
<p>So by having this complexity of our universe did God ever interacted with the Universe? Well if he really did, was there any proof or exhibition of such physical interaction? Was he ever detected by any means?   But how can someone not detectable ever logically existed??</p>
<p>Just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.anatheist.net/2008/07/six-reasons-to-believe-in-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anatheist.net/?p=70#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Those 3 &quot;reasons&quot; are the same reason stated 3 different ways!

I believe in SuperGod.

10 Reasons to Believe in SuperGod:

1. Your god is too complex to have arisen purely by chance!
2. Your god&#039;s brain is too amazingly complex to have arisen by luck alone!
3. Chance and natural causes are insufficient explanations for your god!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those 3 &#8220;reasons&#8221; are the same reason stated 3 different ways!</p>
<p>I believe in SuperGod.</p>
<p>10 Reasons to Believe in SuperGod:</p>
<p>1. Your god is too complex to have arisen purely by chance!<br />
2. Your god&#8217;s brain is too amazingly complex to have arisen by luck alone!<br />
3. Chance and natural causes are insufficient explanations for your god!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
